REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF THE SEISMIC AND GEOPHYSICAL PARAMETERS AND ITS APPLICATION FOR SEISMICITY STUDY OF THE TRANSCARPATHIAN REGION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.90.07Keywords:
regression analysis, seismicity of Transcarpathian region, deformation, geoacoustic emissionAbstract
The purpose of this work is to interpret the experimental data (deformation, geoacoustic and earthquake parameters) and to establish their relation with the seismicity of the Transcarpathian region using statistical (regression) analysis. The correlation of geophysical parameters is described, namely: deformation, geoacoustic emission and seismic characteristics of magnitude and energy class.For construction of the statistical (regression) model, geoacoustic and deformation data for the period of 2014, as well as data of the seismological catalog provided by the seismicity department of the Carpathian region (Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of NAS of Ukraine) were used. The statistical model of seismicity is built to analyze various geophysical parameters and to establish their relationship with each other by means of regression analysis.This interconnection will give an opportunity to understand how seismicity influences the change of various environmental parameters of the Transcarpathian region. The deformation and geoacoustic data used in the work were obtained at the mode geophysical station (MGS) "Beregove" and the observation point "Janoshi" (Transcarpathia). The basic regression analysis formulas used to construct a linear statistical model are given. According to the seismic catalog, a graph of dependence between energy class (K) and magnitude (MD) for the period 2002–2016 was constructed, which confirmed their dependence, as well as a histogram of seismic activity for the period 2002–2016, from which it follows that the largest number of events was in 2015. The tables, on which graphs of seismicity dependence on deformation and geoacoustics, are presented. The relationship between the magnitude (MI) and the offset shift (lg DP) in depth (h) is shown. Studies were conducted for different depths: 1) up to 2 km, 2) from 2–5 km, 3)5–10 km and 4) from 10 km or more. The results showed that the greater the depth, the greater the relationship between the magnitude (MI) and the offset shift (lg DP) is. Such studies are needed to identify the effect of seismicity on the change of other environmental parameters, in particular, temperature, characteristics of earthquake foci, which will allow building an existing model of seismicity of the Transcarpathian region.
References
Devis, Dzh. (1990). Statisticheskiy analiz dannyih v geologii. In 2 books. M. : Nedra. [in Russian]
Hom'yak, M.M. (2004). Geostatistika. Prt. 2. Vstup do dispersIynogo, korelyatsIynogo ta regresIynogo analIzu. LvIv : Vidavnichiy tsentr LNU ImenI Ivana Franka. [in Ukrainian]
Malitskiy, D., Hom'yak, M., AstashkIna, O., MahnItskiy, M., Mikita, A., KutnIv, O., Koval, Yu. (2017). LInIyna regresIyna model yak chastina geofIzichnogo monItoringu seysmotektonIchnih protsesIv Karpatskogo regIonu. MaterIali naukovoyi konferentsiyi-semInaru "SeysmologIchnI ta geofIzichnI doslIdzhennya v seysmoaktivnih regIonah", LvIv : Spolom, 30–34. [in Ukrainian]
Malitskiy, D., Nazarevich, A., AstashkIna, O., Koval, Yu., MahnItskiy, M., (2015). GeoakustichnI sposterezhennya na punktI "YanoshI" u ZakarpattI. Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology, 1(68), 39– 43. [in Ukrainian]
Nazarevich, A.V. (2011). Metodiko-aparaturnI problemi monItoringovih geofIzichnih doslIdzhen ta shlyahi yih rozv'yazannya (na prikladI geofIzichnogo seysmoprognostichnogo monItoringu v ZakarpattI). Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology, 55, 57–60. [in Ukrainian]
Nazarevich, A.V., Nazarevich, L.E. (2002). ParametrichnI seysmogeoakustichnI metodi I kompleksni tehnologiyi monItoringu prirodnih ta tehnogennih geodinamIchnih protsesiv ta prognozu katastrof. Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology, 23–24, 43–47. [in Ukrainian]
Pochinayko, R., Mikita, A., Ludzyan, L. (1996). Priymannya suputnikovoyi informatsiyi v sistemi geodinamichnogo monitoringu. Zb. tez mizhnar. simpoziumu "Geoinformatsiyniy monitoring navkolishnogo seredovischa", Alushta–LvIv, 16. [in Ukrainian]
Sobolev, G.A., Ponomarev, A.V. (1999). Akusticheskaya emissiya i stadii podgotovki razrusheniya v laboratornom eksperimente. Vulkanologiya i seysmologiya, 4–5, 50–62. [in Ukrainian]
Thingbaijam, KKS, Mai, P.M., Goda, Katsuichiro. (2017). New Empirical Earthquake Source-Scaling Laws. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107, 5, 2225–2246.
Verbitskiy, T.Z., Nazarevich, A.V. (2005). DeformografIchnI I geoakustichnI doslIdzhennya u ZakarpattI. DoslIdzhennya suchasnoyi geodinamIki Ukrayinskih Karpat. Eds. V.I. Starostenko. Kiyiv : Nauk. dumka, 113–131. [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Read the policy here: https://geology.bulletin.knu.ua/licensing




