ASSESSMENT OF THE TOURIST ATTRACTIVENESS OF GLOBAL GEOPARKS IN EUROPE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.98.02Keywords:
geoparks, geomorphosites, geotourism attractions, geotourism attractivenessAbstract
The article provides an inventory of geoparks from the list of the UNESCO Global Geoparks Network. It is noted that geoparks as important tourist attractions have been the subject of scientific attention of many authors, but the data presented in these publications are outdated and can not claim to be relevant to the current state of the geoparks network, as it is quite dynamic and changes every year. The research of the chosen topic in the scientific domestic and foreign literature is characterized. The insufficiency of the tourism research of the UNESCO geoparks system is pointed out. The structural-territorial analysis of the distribution of objects is performed: absolute and relative indicators of the number of objects by macroregions are established. A cartographic model of the distribution of objects on the planet is presented. Monitoring of a specific set of geotourism attractions within each of the geoparks is done taking into account the following thematic types: geological and geomorphological (geological and geomorphological formations - the mountains, intermountain basins and gorges, craters and cones of volcanoes, river valleys, deltas and canyons, lakes, waterfalls, sea coasts, deserts and aeolian, glaciers and glacial, karst and pseudo-karst landforms, geological forms and phenomena - the minerals, rocks, structural and tectonic formations, paleontological fossils, geothermal phenomena; geological and geomorphological processes - volcanic eruptions, geyser explosions, avalanches, coastal processes on sea and lake coasts, melting glaciers, dune movements, erosion processes); industrial (the open and underground mine workings, clay and sand quarries, pits, exploratory shafts, drain lines, rock dumps, tunnels, catacombs, surface and underground military objects, engineering and geological activities, construction of tunnels, construction of roads and highways, use of geothermal water); cultural and cognitive (works of material culture are different buildings made of natural materials and the elements of their arrangement, stone pyramids, rock cities and temples, the stone artefacts, the stone elements of urban infrastructure, the works of art, jewellery, museum and other expositions, open-air expositions, such places of fossils, supporting stratigraphic sections, places of minerals and rocks location); tourist and infrastructural attractions (availability of the geopark for the access by several types of transport, several tourist accommodation options, currency exchange offices, recreation facilities, parking lots, places for tents; Tourist Information Centres; marked tourist routes for the needs of several types of tourism (cycling, green-, caving, water- tourism); marking of tourist attractions (information stands. Information support of tourism (creating internet portals of the geopark, mobile applications); accessibility of the geopark to the inclusive tourists). According to the indicators of occupancy of various thematic blocks, geoparks were ranked according to the scale of levels of attractiveness.
References
Alexandrowicz, Z. (2006). Geopark – nature protection category aiding the promotion og geotourism (Polish perspective). GeoTurystyka, 2 (5), 3–12.
Alexandrowicz, Z. (2006). Geoparki – nowe wyzwanie dla ochrony dziedzictwa geologicznego. Przeg. Geologiczny, 54, 1, 36–41.
Bairak, H., Teodorovych, L. (2020). Heoloho-heomorfolohichni obiekty Beskydiv Ukrainskykh Karpat ta yikh turystychna pryvablyvist. Zhurnal heolohii, heohrafii ta heoekolohii, 29 (1), 16-29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15421/112002
Chen, A., Lu, Y., Ng, Y.C.Y. (2015). The Principles of Geotourism. Springer, Beijing.
Cutler, S.Q. (2010). Geotourism: The tourism of geology and landscape. Goodfellow Publishers Ltd, Oxford. Doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.021
Denysyk, G.I., Strashevs'ka, L.V., Korinnyj, V.I. (2014). Geosajty Podillja [Geosites of Podolia]. Vinnycja: Vinnyc'ka oblasna drukarnja. [In Ukrainian]
Dowling, R. (2011). Geotourism's global growth. Geoheritage, 3, 1–13.
Du, Yi, Girault Y.A. (2018). Genealogy of UNESCO Global Geopark: Emergence and Evolution. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 6 (2), 1-17. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01974364/document
Geotourism. (2006). Ed. by K. Dowling Ross and David Newsome. Elsevier Ltd.
Gray, M. (2004). Geodiversyty: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Herrera-Franco, G., Montalván-Burbano, N., Carrión-Mero, P., JayaMontalvo, M., Gurumendi-Noriega, M. (2021). Worldwide Research on Geoparks through Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 13(3), 1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031175
Gordon, J. E. (2005). Geological conservation. Encyclopedia of Geology, 29-35. Doi: 10.1016/B0-12-369396-9/00186-6.
Hose, T.A. (2000). European "Geotourism" – geological internation and geoconservation promotion for tourists. In Barettino. D. (Ed.) Geological Heritage: Its Conservation and Management. Instituto Tecnologico GeoMinero de España. Madrid, 127–146.
Khomenko, Yu. T., Isakov, L. V., Manyuk, V. V. (2018). On the development of geotouristic routes on the objects of the Precambrian Rock Association of the Western Priazоvia. Journ. Geol. Geograph. Geoecology, 27(2), 244-260. Doi:10.15421/111849
Kravchuk, JA., Boguc'kyj, A., Brusak, V., Zinko, Ju., Shevchuk, O. (2012). The designed geoparks of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Nauk. visn. Cherniv. nacion. un-tu, Geografija, 612-613, 102-107. [In Ukrainian]
List of Geoparks & Regional Networks. (2021). Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/global-geoparks/list.
Manyuk, V. (2007). The problem of creation of Network National Geoparks in Ukraine. Dnipropetrovsk. Bulletin of the DNU, 9, 11, 63-67. Doi: 10.15421/110714
Newsome, D., Dowling, R. (2005). The scope and nature of geotourism. In: Dowling, R.K., Newsome, D. (Eds.), Geotourism. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 3–25. Ollier C.D. (2012). Problems of geotourism and geodiversity. Quaestiones Geographicae, 31(3), 57–61. Doi: 10.2478/v10117-012-0025-5.
Ólafsdóttir, R., Tverijonaite, E. (2018). Geotourism: A Systematic Literature Review. Geosciences, 8(7), 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8070234
Ramsay, T. (2017). Fforest Fawr Geopark – a UNESCO Global Geopark distinguished by its geological, industrial and cultural heritage. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 128, 3, 500-509. Doi: 10.1016/j.pgeola.2016.12.010.
Stoffelen A. (2019). Where is the community in geoparks? A systematic literature review and call for attention to the societal embedding of geoparks. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12549
UNESCO Geoparks Programme – a new initiative to promote a global network of geoparks safeguarding and developing selected areas having significant geological features (1999). Hundred and fifty-sixth Session. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Executive Board. Paris.
Shevchuk, O. (2011). Methodical bases of creation of national geoparks in Ukraine. Nauk. visn. Cherniv. nacion. untu, Geografija, 587–588, 82-88. [In Ukrainian]
Zinko Yu., Shevchuk O. (2008a). Peredumovy stvorennia heoparku "Ukrainski Tovtry". Materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. "Okhorona i menedzhment obiektiv nezhyvoi pryrody na zapovidnykh terytoriiakh", Hrymailiv–Ternopil: Dzhura, 94-99. [In Ukrainian]
Zinko Yu., Shevchuk O. (2008b). Pryrodookhoronni heomorfolohichni obiekty u strukturi heoturyzmu Zakhidnoi Ukrainy. Visn. Lviv. un-tu. Ser. heohr., 35, 94-103. [In Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Read the policy here: https://geology.bulletin.knu.ua/licensing




