BASIC CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS FEATURES AS A TOOL FOR MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT ANALYSIS OF SUBSOIL USE PROJECTS

Authors

  • Stanislav LYTVYNYUK State Commission of Ukraine on Mineral Reserves, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Mariia KURYLO Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Ivan VIRSHILO Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine. Gas Research Institute of JSC "Ukrgazvydobuvannya", Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Mykhailo BRATAKH Gas Research Institute of JSC "Ukrgazvydobuvannya", Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.102.08

Keywords:

Classification, reserves, resource management, categories, classifications features

Abstract

First classification systems of mineral reserves and resources appeared in the beginning of the 20th century, which coincided with the mining development in the UK, Germany and the USA. Modern classifications of mineral raw materials and energy resources, their terminology, definitions and concepts have been developed and improved for more than 40 years. Separate development of the most commonly used classifications has led to the emergence of various definitions and determinations of characteristics of the same or similar categories of mineral reserves and resources according to geological and technical-economic characteristics. The article proposes methodological approaches of "operational harmonization" (universal classifier) as a toolkit for resource management and investment analysis of deposits (subsoil areas) of solid (metallic and non-metallic) minerals. The analysis and classification of the resources of the complex subsoil use project, which includes the use of geothermal resources, salt reserves, and the accompanying extraction of useful components from the associated reservoir waters, which differ in the degree of study and implementation, have been carried out. For this Solotvino project, full consideration of all classification features of both individual component resources and the project as a whole is recorded, only when applying the UNFC classification.

References

Baryats'ka, N.V., Safronova, N.H. (2020). Zastosuvannya mizhnarodnykh klasyfikatsiy zapasiv i resursiv – zaporuka investytsiynoyi pryvablyvosti ukrayins'kykh rodovyshch. Aktual'ni problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku heolohiyi ta ekolohiyi: nauka y vyrobnytstvo. Materialy VII Mizhnarodnoho heolohichnoho forumu, 15–20 June 2020, Odesa, Ukraine, 15–23 [in Ukrainian].

Lozyniak, P., Mysyura, Ya. (2009). Prospects of gas-bearing deposits of the Hrushiv region of the Transcarpathian depression. Geology and geochemistry of combustible minerals, 2(147), 1–39 [in Ukrainian].

Classification of reserves of solid mineral deposits. (1981). Approved by Resolution No. 1128 of the Council of Ministers of the USSR dated November 30, 1981.

Bridging Document between CRIRSCO and UNFC (2015). UNECE. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/energy/se/pdfs/UNFC/UNFC_specs/Revise d_CRIRSCO_Template_UNFC_Bridging_Document.pdf

Bridging Document between PRMS and UNFC (2013). UNECE. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/energy/se/pdfs/UNFC/UNFC_specs/RPMS _UNFC2009_Bridging_ES42.pdf

Camisani-Calzolari, F.A. (2004). National and international codes for reporting mineral resources and reserves: Their relevance, future and comparison. The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, June 2004, 297–305.

International reporting template for the public reporting of exploration targets, exploration results, mineral resources and mineral reserves. CRIRSCO. (2019). The CRIRSCO International Reporting Template. https://www.crirsco.com/template/

Minventory metadata portal. (2023). National reporting. Data harmonisation and standardisation, https://ec.europa.eu/assets/jrc/minventory/national-reporting 26c9.html?field_cs_country_lexique_tid=

Reichl, C., Schatz, M. (2022). Minerals Production. Vienna, World Mining Data 2022. https://www.world-mining-data.info/wmd/downloads/PDF/ WMD2022.pdf

Rudko, G., Kurylo M., Bala, V. (2018). Criteria for determining industrial significance of coal reserves: domestic classification vs JORC. Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology, 1(80), 63–68. http://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.80.08 [in Ukrainian].

Rudko, G.I. (2017). UNFC mineral reserves and resources as a tool for harmonizing world classifications. Mineral resources of Ukraine, (4), 7–10. https://mru-journal.com.ua/index.php/mru/article/view/223 [in Ukrainian].

The JORC Code 2012 Edition. (2012). Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, p.44. https://www.jorc.org/docs/JORC_code_2012.pdf

UNFC and Social and Environmental Management. (н.д.). https://unece.org/unfc-and-social-and-environmental-management-0

UNFC United Nations Framework Classification for Resources (UNFC). (2019). https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/E_ECE_ENERGY_ 109_WEB.pdf1

Wagner, M., Bide, T., Cassard, D., Huisman, J., Leroy, P., Bavec, Š. et al. (2019). Optimising quality of informationin RAW materials data collection across Europe (ORAMA). Technical Final Report & Recommendations. November 15, 2019, Brussels, Belgium. http://www.orama-h2020.eu

Published

2025-01-16

How to Cite

LYTVYNYUK, S., KURYLO, M., VIRSHILO, I., & BRATAKH, M. (2025). BASIC CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS FEATURES AS A TOOL FOR MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT ANALYSIS OF SUBSOIL USE PROJECTS. Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology, 3(102), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.102.08