3D MAGNETIC MODEL OF THE EARTH CRUST OF THE EASTERN EUROPEAN CRATON WITH THE ACCOUNT OF THE EARTH SPHERICITY AND ITS TECTONIC INTERPRETATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/17282713.79.03Keywords:
East European Craton, 3D magnetic modelAbstract
The geomagnetic field is widely used to obtain information on the deep structure and development of the Earth's lithosphere, small-scale forecasting of minerals, and the solution of a number of environmental problems. The most significant results are obtained due to the development of 2D, 3D and 4D magnetic models of the Earth's crust (lithosphere) in which the spatial and spatiotemporal distribution of magnetic sources is reflected. The reliability of the spatiotemporal distribution (location) of magnetic sources and the magnitudes of their magnetization depends on the adequacy of taking into account the geometry of objects and the inhomogeneity of the Earth's main magnetic field. In this regard, for the East European Craton for the first time its regional 3D magnetic model for a spherical Earth is developed. To develop the model, we used digital data WDMAM at a height of 5 km, a priori data on the depths of the surface of the crystalline basement and Moho, the temperature distribution, as well as the results of other geological and geophysics researches. According to S.V. Bogdanova, the Eastern European Craton was formed due to the suturation of three segments (Fennoscandia, Volgo-Uralia and Sarmatia) in a time interval of 2,1–1,8 Ga. At the Phanerozoic stage of development, the modern borders of the craton were formed. It is established that a non-uniform distribution of magnetic sources and magnitudes of their magnetization is observed on the boundaries of the craton. The maximum concentration of magnetic sources is characteristic for the edge parts of the craton. The southwestern boundary of the craton is marked by magnetic sources with a magnetization of (1,0–3,0) A/m at depths of (10–18÷46) km. Stretching of the sources is consistent with the stretch of the Trans-European sutural zone and the Baltic-Transnistrian zone of pericratonic troughs (subsidence). The stretching of magnetic sources in the southeast of the craton within Fennoscandia and the Volgo-Uralia is coordinated with the strike of the Phanerozoic structures of the Ural and Timan. Magnetic sources lie in the interval (10–18÷38–44) km and have a magnetization of (0,7–4,0) A / m. Magnetic sources of the northern (within Fennoscandia) and southern (within Sarmatia) parts of the craton have an end joint with its boundary. The zones of articulation of the EEC segments are also distinguished by sources of regional magnetic anomalies. Magnetic sources of the Central-Russian rift system divide the magnetic crust of the Volgo-Uralia and the weak magnetic crust of Fennoscandia, and the sources of the Volyn-Orsha rift system are Fennoscandia and Sarmatia. Magnetic sources of the Pachelma rift zone are separated by Sarmatia and Volgo-Uralia. We note that approximately the same strike has magnetic anomalies of the Kursk-Bryansk band with maximal values of the magnetization of their sources within the limits of the craton (˃10,0 A/m). According to the concept of tectonics of lithospheric plates, the magnetic inhomogeneity of the zones of suturation of the segments of the craton and its outer boundaries can be considered as sources of subduction type, which arose at the stage of their formation. In the Riphean and Phanerozoic stages of the development of the lithosphere within the zones of suturation of the segments of the craton and its outer boundaries, magnetic sources of rift nature were formed. Magnetic sources of subduction-reduction and rifting types are characterized by a corresponding metallogenic specialization, therefore the developed model can be used both for tectonic constructions and for small-scale forecasting of minerals.
References
Bogdanova, S. (1986). The Russian platform crust in the Early Precambrian (with reference to the Volgo-Ural segment). Moscow: Nauka, 220 р. [in Russian].
Garetsky, R.G. (1995). Aulacogens of the cratons in Northern Euroasia. Geotektonika, 4, 16–28. [in Russian].
Garetsky, R.G., Karataev, G.I. (2011). Tectonogeodynamic model junction of Fennoscandian and Sarmatian segments of the East European Platform. Geology and Geophysics, 52(10), 1557-1566. [in Russian].
Orlyuk, M.I., Kovalenko-Zavoisky, V.M., Ivashchenko, I.M., Marchenko, A.V. (2007). Interpretation of regional magnetic anomalies for spherical Earth. Thesis of VIIIth International conference "Monitoring of a dangerous geological processes and environmental ecological state", 76–77. [In Ukrainian].
Nechaeva, T.S., Shymkiv, L.M., Gorkavko, V.M. (2002). Map of anomaly magnetic field (ΔT)a Ukraine. Scale of 1:1 000 000.Kyiv, 1sh. [In Ukrainian].
Kovalenko-Zavoisky, V.M., Ivashchenko, I.M. (2006). Mathematical support of ∆Ва field interpretation. Geophysical Journal, 28(5), 18–30. [In Ukrainian].
Kutas, R.I. (1993). Thermal field and geothermal regime of the lithosphere. In: Chekunov, A.V. (Eds.) Lithosphere Central and Eastern Europe. Summary of the Studies. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 115–132. [in Russian].
Pashkevich, I.K., Markovskiy, V.S., Orlyuk, M.I., Eliseeva, S.V., Mozgovaya, A.P., Tarashchan, S.A. (1990). Magnetic model of the lithosphere Europe. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 168 р. [in Russian].
Fedorova, N.V., Kolmogorova, V.V., Rublev, A.L., Tsidaev, A.G. (2013). The magnetic model of the north-eastern region of Europe. Geofizicheskiye issledovaniya, 14(2), 25–37. [Іn Russian].
Orlyuk, M.I., Romenets, A.A., Marchenko, A.V., Orlyuk, I.M., Ivashchenko, I.N. (2015). Magnetic declination in the territory of Ukraine: the results of observations and calculations. Geophysical Journal, 37 (2). 73–85. [Іn Russian].
Orlyuk, M.I., Pashkevich, I.K. (2012). Deep sources of regional magnetic anomalies: tectonotypes and relation with transcrustal faults. Geophysical Journal, 34(4), 224–234. [Іn Russian].
Orlyuk, M.I., Pashkevich, I.K. (1995). Magnetic model of the Earth's crust for the South-East of the East-European Platform. Geophysical Journal, 17(6), 31–36. [Іn Russian].
Orlyuk, M.I. (2000). Spatial and spatio-temporal magnetic models of different rank structures lithosphere of the continental type. Geophysical Journal, 22(6), 148–165. [Іn Russian].
Orlyuk, M.I. (1993). Geotraverse III. Magnetic model. In: Chekunov, A.V. (Eds.) Lithosphere of Central and Eastern Europe. Geotraverses III, VII, IX. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 30–35. [Іn Russian].
Orlyuk, M.I., Marchenko, A.V. (2008). Mapping support for the 3D magnetic model the earth crust of the East European platform (for spherical Earth). Thesis of International Scientific Conference "Geophysical technologies for predicting and monitoring of geological media". Lviv, 6-10 October 2008, 154–155. [In Ukrainian].
Pashkevich, I.K., Sharov, N.V., Savchenko, A.S., Starostenko, V.I. (2014). Three-dimensional geological-geophysical lithosphere model of the central part of the Karelian craton. Geophysical Journal, 36(6), 58–78. [in Russian].
Pashkevich, I.K., Orlyuk, M.I., Eliseeva, S.V. (1994). Platformal areas of Europe. In: Pechersky, D.M. (Eds.) Petromagnetic Model of the Lithosphere. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 109–124. [Іn Russian].
Sollogub, V.B. (1986). Lithosphere of Ukraine. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 184 р. [Іn Russian].
Chekunov,A.V. (Ed.) (1992). Scheme of lithospheric deep structure of southwestern part of the East European Platform. Sc. 1000000. Kyiv: Goscomgeology, 6sh. [Іn Russian].
Fedorova, N.V. (2001). Crustal magnetization models along the Granite geotraverse. Uralsky geofizichesky vestnik, 2, 88–93. [Іn Russian].
Artemieva, I., Mooney, D. (2001). Thermal thickness and evolution of Precambrian lithosphere: A global study. Journal of geophysical research, 106, B8, 16387 –16414. doi:10.1029/2000JB900439
Bogdanova, S., Gorbatschev, R., Garetsky, R.G. (2016). EUROPE|East European Craton in book Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, 1–18. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-4095489.10020-X
Bogdanova, S., Gorbachev, R., Grad, M. et al. (2006). EUROBRIDGE: new insight into the geodynamic evolution of the East European Craton. In: Gee, D.G., Stephenson, R.A. (Eds.). European Lithosphere Dynamics. London: Geological Society, 32, 599–625.
Grad, M., Tiira, T., ESC Working Group. (2009). The Moho depth map of the European Plate. Geophysical Journal International, 176, 279-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03919.x
Korhonen, J., Fairhead, J.D., Hamoudi, M., Hemant, K., Lesur, V., Mandea, M., Maus, S., Purucker, M., Ravat, D., Sazonova, T., Thébault, E. (2007). Magnetic anomaly map of the world–carte des anomalies magnétiques du monde. Commission for Geological Map of the World 1st Edition. Paris, France.
Orlyuk, M.I. (1996). Tektonic interpretation of 4-dimensional magnetic model for the south – western part of the East-European platform. EUROBRIDGE workshop. 8-15 June 1996. Oskarshamn, Sweden, 28.
Bogdanova, S.V., Pashkevich, I.K., Gorbatschev, R., Orlyuk, M.I. (1996). Riphean rifting and major Paleoproterozoic crustal boundaries in the basement of the East European Craton: geology and geophysics. Tectonophysics, 268, 1–21.
Thébault, E., Purucker, M., Whaler, K.A., Langlais, B., Sabaka, T.J. (2010). The Magnetic Field of the Earth's Lithosphere. Space Science Reviews, 95–127. doi:10.1007/s11214-010-9667-6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Read the policy here: https://geology.bulletin.knu.ua/licensing




