"EL TORO” GOLD MINE (PERU): GEOLOGICAL FEATURES AND PERSPECTIVES

Authors

  • Н. Villena CDC Gold, Los Andes Peru Gold Mining Company 1420 La Encalada Str., Surco, Lima, Peru, 33

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/17282713.81.10

Keywords:

epithermal gold deposit, clastic sediments mineralization, mining district, lithological and structural interpretation, 3D geologic modeling

Abstract

El Toro is an epithermal gold deposit with an epizonal conformation being hosted in the clastic sediments of lower Cretaceous (Chimu Formation). The ore deposit is located in La Libertad Region in northern Peru. Spatially it configures an elongated geometry that aligns with the Andes mountain ridges; geomorphologically it is a 1.0 x 1.5 km dome structure. The dome axis is formed by a subvolcanic intrusion of dacite / andesite composition (20–18 Myr), the basement deposit consists of pelitic rocks, slate, shales and carbonaceous slimes of Chicama Formation. They are underlain by clastic sequences of Goyllarisquizga Group conformed to quartz and laminar sandstones. Locally, four tectonic events (ET) are recognized: ET-2 (overthrust faults), ET-4 (NW-SE faults), ET-5 (high angle NW-SE faults) and ET-6 (annular faults). Mineralization in oxides constitutes 80% of current mineral resources and is related to sedimentary rocks, tectonic breccia, hydrothermal breccia, collapse breccia and oxidized dacite blocks; while sulfides and mixed materials are restricted to dacite/andesite bodies. The resource estimation results performed in 2014 (NI 43-101 Resources Technical Report, El Toro gold project) determine: 65,000 gold ounces of measured resources, 27,600 gold ounces of indicated and 398,000 gold ounces of inferred resources. According to projection and based on the interpretation and correlation of structural styles , lithological domains and similar ore deposits, approximately 1,500 km2 demarcation is outlined (El Toro-Altagracia, proposal of a new mining district).This preliminary interpretation is also based on analogical correlation with other mining districts with similar genesis and resources that would surpass in total thirty million gold ounces.  

References

Acosta, J., Quispe, J., Rivera, R., Valencia, M., Chirif, H., Huanacuni, D., Rodriguez, I., Villarreal, E., Paico, D., Santiesteban, A. (2017). Metalogenic Map of Peru. Geological, mining and metallurgical institute of Peru.

Benavides, V. (1956). Cretaceous system in northern Peru. American Museum of Natural History, 108, 4, 353-494.

Broggi, J. (1942). The geology of quadrangles: Chotano river en Lajas. Geologic Society of Peru, 12, 1, 5-23.

Cossio, A. (1964). The geology of quadrangles: Santiago de Chuco and Santa Rosa, 8, 69.

Corbett. G., Leach, T. (1998). Southwest Pacific Rim Gold-Copper Systems: Structure, alteration and mineralization. Society of economic Geologist. Sp. Pub. 6.

Jacay, J. (1992). Jurasic stratigraphy and sedimentology, Chicama valley and Jurasic-Cretasic paleographic outline of northern Peru. Thesis. San Marcos University National, 166.

Laughlin D. (1924). Geology and physiography of the Peruvian Cordillera. Departaments of Junin and Lima. Geological Society of America, 35, 3, 591-632.

SGS Geostat. (2014). NI 43-101 Resources Technical Report, El Toro gold project, 83.

Villena, H., Salinas, C. (2016). El Toro – Altagracia, The new gold district of north Peruvian (Geological Connotations and Exploratory Perspectives), La Libertad Region, Peru, Technical summary XXXIII PERUMIN, 3-4.

Villena, H., Salinas, C. (2016). El Toro, Characteristics and evidences of great gold deposit, Huamachuco, La Libertad Region, Peru. Technical summary XXXIII PERUMIN, 1-5.

Wilson, J. (1963). Cretaceous stratigraphy of Central Andes os Peru. AAPG, 47,1, 1-34.

Wilson, J., Reyes, L. (1967). The geology of quadrangles: Mollebamba, Tayabamaba, Huaylas, Pomabamba, Carhuaz and Huari. Geology and mining Service, 16, 104.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-16

How to Cite

Villena Н. (2025). "EL TORO” GOLD MINE (PERU): GEOLOGICAL FEATURES AND PERSPECTIVES. Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology, 2(81), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.17721/17282713.81.10