THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PRODUCTIVE STRATA WITHIN TYNIV-HRUSHIV OIL AND GAS FIELD

Authors

  • D. Fedoryshyn Ivano-Frankivsk national technical university of oil and gas, 15 Karpatska Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019, Ukraine
  • I. Bagriy Institute of Geological Sciences of NAS of Ukraine 55-b Honchar Str., Kyiv, 01054, Ukraine
  • A. Trubenko Ivano-Frankivsk national technical university of oil and gas, 15 Karpatska Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019, Ukraine
  • S. Fedoryshyn Ivano-Frankivsk national technical university of oil and gas, 15 Karpatska Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019, Ukraine
  • N. Khovanets Ivano-Frankivsk national technical university of oil and gas, 15 Karpatska Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.87.04

Keywords:

Productive strata, gas condensate field, the lower Dashava age, sandstone, lens, water-bearing horizon

Abstract

The findings of the geological and geophysical researches reveal the high prospects of Krukenychi Depression in terms of new deposits discovery. Notably, some productive reservoir rocks have been indentified within the Neogene formations of Tyniv-Hrushiv Oil and Gas Field. The major gas capacity is associated with the lower Dashava deposits; that is supported by considerable well rates which were apparent within previously discovered fields. According to the readings of the geophysical well logging, the correlation pattern of prospective strata distribution has been introduced; as a followup, it has been determined what the fluid content is within the lower Dashava age. Consequently, just over the gas-bearing reservoir rocks, the waterbearing strata have been located. The geological structure of the lower Dashava age is featured by the two-meter unit of claystones and siltstones which separate the water-bearing strata from the productive ones. The very feature of the geological structure causes the encroachment of productive horizons; that is proved by the well testing results. The more thorough researches help to define the key factors which influence the distribution of the sand material through the section of the Sarmatian age. Furthermore, it is possible to set up a water and gas ratio within the productive strata. 

References

Fedoryshyn, D.D. (1996). Osoblyvosti heolohichnoi budovy rozrizu hazovykh rodovyshch Bilche-Volytskoi zony Peredkarpatskoho prohynu, yak perspektyva poshuku enerhetychnykh dzherel. Netradytsiini enerhoresursy ta ekolohiia Ukrainy, Kyiv, 85-87.

Medvid, H.B. (2011). Paleohidrodynamichnyi chynnyk u protsesi formuvannia pokladiv vuhlevodniv u mezhakh pivnichno-zakhidnoi chastyny Zovnishnoi zony Peredkarpatskoho prohynu. Heodynamika, 2 (11), 199-201.

Moroshan, R.P. (1996). Vdoskonalennia ta vyprobuvannia v naftohazonosnykh rehionakh Ukrainy metodyky prohnozuvannia heolohichnoho rozrizu na osnovi seismolitmolohichnoho analizu danykh seismorozvidky ta sumizhnoi heolohoheofizychnoi informatsii. Zvit z NDR (zakliuchnyi). UkrDHRI.

Pavliukh, O. (2009). Osoblyvosti heolohichnoi budovy ta formuvannia pokladiv hazu v Zovnishnii zoni Peredkarpatskoho prohynu. Heolohiia i heokhimiia horiuchykh kopalyn, 3, 31-44.

Zaiats, Kh.B. (2013). Hlybynna budova nadr Zakhidnoho rehionu Ukrainy na osnovi seismichnykh doslidzhen i napriamky poshukovykh robit na naftu i haz. Lviv.

Zaiats, Kh.B. Moroshan, R.P., Hula, O.S., Butsiak, B.M. (2006). Eroziinyi paleorelief osnovy Krukenytskoi zapadyny yak vyznachalnyi faktor poshukiv naftohazoperspektyvnykh ob'iektiv v sarmatskykh vidkladakh. Novi heofizychni tekhnolohii prohnozuvannia ta monitorynhu heolohichnoho seredovyshcha, Lviv, 15-16.

Published

2025-01-10

How to Cite

Fedoryshyn, D., Bagriy, I., Trubenko, A., Fedoryshyn, S., & Khovanets, N. (2025). THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PRODUCTIVE STRATA WITHIN TYNIV-HRUSHIV OIL AND GAS FIELD. Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology, 4(87), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.87.04