CONTROL SAMPLES USING FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL (QA/QC)

Authors

  • N. Bariatska Geological Service Company LLC, 22a Borychiv Tik Str., Kyiv, 04070, Ukraine
  • S. Sergeieva Geological Service Company LLC, 22a Borychiv Tik Str., Kyiv, 04070, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.101.11

Keywords:

Quality Assurance, Quality Control, QA/QC, control samples

Abstract

Іn geological exploration, the quality of the data underlying of resource and reserve estimation is critically important. According to various international regulations and current world best practices, Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) programs are a necessary part of geological exploration. Quality Assurance (QA) is used to avoid the problems with quality, Quality Control (QC) is aimed at detecting them in case of their occurrence, and together they form the overall Quality System – QA/QC. The article considers the main stages of the history of QA/QC development, which begins in the Middle Ages and continues in our time.
Control samples used to control analytical tests have different types and purposes / functions: standards, preparation blanks, coarse blanks, analytical blanks, field duplicates, coarse duplicates, pulp duplicates and umpire laboratory control. Their amount and ratio is the main topic of the research. According to the published data of nine different authors, the recommended control sample amount of each type is different. On average, the amount of control samples of all types is about 20% of the total number of routine samples.
In order to highlight the current state of the issue, the authors of the article have analyzed 111 QA/QC programs for 87 ore projects according to the public reports disclosed by the issuers of the Toronto Stock Exchange. So, in practice, the control sample amount does not necessarily reach the recommended 20 % and is slightly more than 16 %.
The main conclusions regarding the amount and ratio of control samples can be presented as follows: (1) the general increasing trend in the amount and variety of control samples is observed; (2) among the control sample types, the so-called standards are most often used, and the least used are coarse blanks; (3) the control sample amount and variety also depends on the mineral type; (4) at more advanced exploration stages of the project, the control sample relative number usually increases, but in some cases it may decrease if the results of the previous stages are satisfactory, and the methodology and laboratory are not changed.

References

Abzalov, M.Z. (2008). Quality control of assay data: a review of procedures for measuring and monitoring precision and accuracy. Exploration and Mining Geology, 3–4 (17), 131–144.

Allmendinger, О. (2018). Quality assurance and quality control programme QA/QC. https://www.micromine.ru/qa-qc-quality-control/ [in Russian]

Bariatska, N., Safronova, N. (2019) Stage-by-Stage Verification for Three-Dimensional Modeling and Resource Assessment of ore Deposits. Geoinformatika, 1(69), 47–57. [in Russian]

Bloom, L. (1999). The role of economic geologists in evaluating assay data quality.

Casey, J.P. (2019). Mining scandals: four incidents that shook the industry. https://www.mining-technology.com/features/mining-scandals-four-incidents-that-shook-the-industry/

CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. Best Practice Guidelines. (2019). Quebec: Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 75 p.

Dominy, S., Purevgerel, S., Esbensen, K. (2020). Quality and sampling error quantification for gold mineral resource estimation. Spectroscopy Europe, 32 (6), 21–27.

Lomas, S. (2004). QAQC Program. General Discussion. AMEC Internal document.

Long, S. (1998). Practical Quality Control Procedures in Mineral Inventory Estimation. Exploration and Mining Geology, 7 (1 and 2), 117–127.

Long, S. (2000). Assay Quality Assurance-Quality Control Program for Drilling Projects at the Prefeasibility to Feasibility Report Level (3 rd . Ed.). MRDI, Internal report.

Neuss, I. (1998). Sampling "Legends"-What Can We Learn from Busang? More Meaningful Sampling in the Mining Industry. Australian Institute of Geoscientists, 2, 109–118.

Rogers, R.S. (1998). Forensic Geology and Mineral Exploration Projects. Exploration and Mining Geology, 7 (1 and 2), 25–27.

SEDAR: System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval, Canadian Securities Administration. (n.d.). https://www.sedar.com/

Simon Méndez, A. (2011) Discussion on Current Quality-Control Practices in Mineral Exploration. Applications and Experiences of Quality Control, 595–610.

Simуn, A. (2007). Control Sample Insertion Rate: Is There an Industry Standard? Program and Abstracts of the 23rd International Applied Geochemistry Symposium (IAGS), Oviedo, Spain, 14–19 June 2007, The Association of Applied Geochemistry, Oviedo.

Sketchley, D. (1999). Case history guidelines for establishing sampling protocols and monitoring quality control. Proceedings of CIMM Annual General Meeting Symposium on Quality Control of Resource Estimations: an ISO Perspective.

The history of quality. (n.d.). https://asq.org/quality-resources/history-of-quality#development

Vallee, M. (1998). Sampling quality control. Exploration and Mining Geology, 7, 107–116.

Published

2025-01-10

How to Cite

Bariatska, N., & Sergeieva, S. (2025). CONTROL SAMPLES USING FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL (QA/QC). Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geology, 2(101), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.101.11